<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Peak News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.murkyview.com/archives/2006/11/20/some-peak-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.murkyview.com/archives/2006/11/20/some-peak-news/</link>
	<description>Striving for perspective.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Billington</title>
		<link>http://www.murkyview.com/archives/2006/11/20/some-peak-news/#comment-14678</link>
		<dc:creator>David Billington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 07:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murkyview.com/archives/2006/11/20/some-peak-news/#comment-14678</guid>
		<description>I don't think biofuel crops require irrigated land to grow.  There are about 400 million acres of cropland in the United States and 160 million or so in Canada. Converting pasturelands to biofuel crops could be done.

There are a lot of questions, though, about whether this would have to be subsidized given the current prices of oil and coal. The energy needed to grow fuel crops is also a factor. 

But if ten percent of North American energy needs could be met through fuel crops, that would be a substantial contribution. The problem is that we may not be able to replace the energy presently supplied by oil if oil supplies tighten sharply enough. 

A lot may depend on newly discovered (or existing but untapped) offshore oil in the North Pacific and Gulf of Mexico.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think biofuel crops require irrigated land to grow.  There are about 400 million acres of cropland in the United States and 160 million or so in Canada. Converting pasturelands to biofuel crops could be done.</p>
<p>There are a lot of questions, though, about whether this would have to be subsidized given the current prices of oil and coal. The energy needed to grow fuel crops is also a factor. </p>
<p>But if ten percent of North American energy needs could be met through fuel crops, that would be a substantial contribution. The problem is that we may not be able to replace the energy presently supplied by oil if oil supplies tighten sharply enough. </p>
<p>A lot may depend on newly discovered (or existing but untapped) offshore oil in the North Pacific and Gulf of Mexico.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
