<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unlikely Agreement: Peak Oil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.murkyview.com/archives/2006/03/21/unlikely-agreement-peak-oil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.murkyview.com/archives/2006/03/21/unlikely-agreement-peak-oil/</link>
	<description>Perspectives on Media, Climate, Energy, Politics... in Port Alberni, BC, Canada, the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:51:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Billington</title>
		<link>http://www.murkyview.com/archives/2006/03/21/unlikely-agreement-peak-oil/comment-page-1/#comment-4930</link>
		<dc:creator>David Billington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 05:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.murkyview.com/archives/2006/03/21/unlikely-agreement-peak-oil/#comment-4930</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Hoover Dam was built by the US Department of the Interior&#039;s Bureau of Reclamation, not by the US Army Corps of Engineers.

The uranium projection in the USACE paper gives the wrong impression that there is a real supply problem and that causes me to wonder about the other projections.  Here is a link to a paper on uranium supply:

http://www.uic.com.au/nip75.htm

Although we&#039;re not going to run out of uranium, I don&#039;t think nuclear power can sustain our way of life in the long run, and fossil fuels certainly can&#039;t.  There is no alternative to renewable energy unless exotic new sources (eg. zero-point energy) become practical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Hoover Dam was built by the US Department of the Interior&#8217;s Bureau of Reclamation, not by the US Army Corps of Engineers.</p>
<p>The uranium projection in the USACE paper gives the wrong impression that there is a real supply problem and that causes me to wonder about the other projections.  Here is a link to a paper on uranium supply:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uic.com.au/nip75.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.uic.com.au/nip75.htm</a></p>
<p>Although we&#8217;re not going to run out of uranium, I don&#8217;t think nuclear power can sustain our way of life in the long run, and fossil fuels certainly can&#8217;t.  There is no alternative to renewable energy unless exotic new sources (eg. zero-point energy) become practical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
